images at you Ashton Kutcher).
WAIT_FOR_EVER_GC
07-08 12:11 PM
No I did not. The instructions said, I don't have to send photos.
That is the reason, they asked me to appear for bio-metrics which I did.
You definitely need to send it even if you get BIOMETERICS
That is the reason, they asked me to appear for bio-metrics which I did.
You definitely need to send it even if you get BIOMETERICS
wallpaper Ashton Kutcher underwear SNL
Green_Always
12-26 09:54 AM
Yes, it is all luck with this kind of stupid process they follow.
If some one in India talks about this stupidity before we come here will be nice I guess as once we come here with lot of ambitions and aspirations without knowing internals of stupidy we all get stuck, neither there nor here and keep waiting for GC dream to come true.
There is no logic for this process.
================================
PD - EB3 - Oct 2001
486 - RD 06/05
1st FP - 07/13/2005
1st SR - 08/04/2006 - Shame Background check pending responce
Transfer to V to T on 03/15/07
2nd FP - 05/08/07
2nd SR - 06/28/2007 - Shame Background check pending responce
FBI NC Cleared - 10/09/2007
Waiting for 485 AD - <no ideia what date to put in here>
=================================
If some one in India talks about this stupidity before we come here will be nice I guess as once we come here with lot of ambitions and aspirations without knowing internals of stupidy we all get stuck, neither there nor here and keep waiting for GC dream to come true.
There is no logic for this process.
================================
PD - EB3 - Oct 2001
486 - RD 06/05
1st FP - 07/13/2005
1st SR - 08/04/2006 - Shame Background check pending responce
Transfer to V to T on 03/15/07
2nd FP - 05/08/07
2nd SR - 06/28/2007 - Shame Background check pending responce
FBI NC Cleared - 10/09/2007
Waiting for 485 AD - <no ideia what date to put in here>
=================================
hcard
08-24 09:30 AM
Hcard was there any LUD on your file ?
Yes, It was 08/05/2007. But that does not matter.
Yes, It was 08/05/2007. But that does not matter.
2011 Ashton Kutcher Underwear:
velan
05-24 12:46 PM
Fax sent.
more...
voldemar
12-11 02:28 PM
It makes no difference whether they allow concurrent filing of 140/485 or not That's not always true. Without concurrent filing my son will not be able to file 485 because he will turn 21 at that time. And I'm pretty sure there are other cases when concurrent filing was very helpful.
krassib
07-10 01:14 PM
The aim of participation on these talk shows is two fold- One to increase the awareness amongst the general masses regarding the problems being faced by legals as the masses are mostly ignorant about out situation. Secondly, for people who are waiting for their GC's and could be potentail members of Immigration Voice for them to join the organization. It has been proven time and again that there is strength in numbers and also the organization needs resources from it's members.
It is a logistical challange to put a program like this together with the host and the panel and IV did a good job at it with knowledgebile authorities like Stuart coming out strongly supporting our cause. Every one felt that the moderation could have been better. It is the skill of Larry King or Neil Conan of NPR that sets them apart but some times there are moderators who are very knowledgible, not necessarily on every issue but are challenged becuase of their heavy accent and other reasons.
One of the posts questioned about the publicity stunt of having a senator on the program. I am not sure if every one realizes the amount of ground work that has to be done to make that happen and must I say that all the efforts were made to get them but it did not work out finally in the end because of issues with timing.
Over all, in my opinion, it was a good program and served IV's agenda.
I would like to thank IV core team for the effort of making our immigration problems public. I could not personally listen to the show and it would be nice if someone posts a link to a recording.
In addition, I know that it may not sound feasible but I have an idea to create our own Internet radio. How you all think?
It is a logistical challange to put a program like this together with the host and the panel and IV did a good job at it with knowledgebile authorities like Stuart coming out strongly supporting our cause. Every one felt that the moderation could have been better. It is the skill of Larry King or Neil Conan of NPR that sets them apart but some times there are moderators who are very knowledgible, not necessarily on every issue but are challenged becuase of their heavy accent and other reasons.
One of the posts questioned about the publicity stunt of having a senator on the program. I am not sure if every one realizes the amount of ground work that has to be done to make that happen and must I say that all the efforts were made to get them but it did not work out finally in the end because of issues with timing.
Over all, in my opinion, it was a good program and served IV's agenda.
I would like to thank IV core team for the effort of making our immigration problems public. I could not personally listen to the show and it would be nice if someone posts a link to a recording.
In addition, I know that it may not sound feasible but I have an idea to create our own Internet radio. How you all think?
more...
sanjeev_2004
10-07 11:58 AM
Guys,
Now I140 can be processed by premium process. Do you thing this premium process in future can start for I485 also?
Sanjeev
Now I140 can be processed by premium process. Do you thing this premium process in future can start for I485 also?
Sanjeev
2010 calvin-klein-underwear-model-
logiclife
04-09 02:13 AM
First of all, ethnicity has nothing to do with hard cap.
First of all, you have to understand what hard-cap implies. Hard cap is a new thing proposed in the bill out of judiciary commitee that PREVENTS over-subscribed countries(Usually that's India and China each year) from using the UNUSED visa numbers each year.
EMPHASIS ON UNUSED.
So, given the 10 percent per country(it is 7% today) each country can and would use UPTO 10 percent of available visas first. FIRST. Usually what happens is that India and China use up their numbers and other countries do not use their own quota. So the unused numbers would be then alloted to India and China rather than being unused to diverted to FB categories.
So the removal of hard cap has NOTHING to do with diversity - ethnically or nationality-wise. HARD CAP DOES NOT PROTECT any country.
Today, the soft cap exists, and the numbers are retrogressed only for India and China. REST of the world is current. Hard cap would make things worse for only those countries that have higher demand and WASTE the visa numbers.
Please get your analysis on hard-cap Vs Soft-cap, the visa usage numbers etc. before you emphasize ethnic diversity as the two have NOTHING to do with each other.
First of all, you have to understand what hard-cap implies. Hard cap is a new thing proposed in the bill out of judiciary commitee that PREVENTS over-subscribed countries(Usually that's India and China each year) from using the UNUSED visa numbers each year.
EMPHASIS ON UNUSED.
So, given the 10 percent per country(it is 7% today) each country can and would use UPTO 10 percent of available visas first. FIRST. Usually what happens is that India and China use up their numbers and other countries do not use their own quota. So the unused numbers would be then alloted to India and China rather than being unused to diverted to FB categories.
So the removal of hard cap has NOTHING to do with diversity - ethnically or nationality-wise. HARD CAP DOES NOT PROTECT any country.
Today, the soft cap exists, and the numbers are retrogressed only for India and China. REST of the world is current. Hard cap would make things worse for only those countries that have higher demand and WASTE the visa numbers.
Please get your analysis on hard-cap Vs Soft-cap, the visa usage numbers etc. before you emphasize ethnic diversity as the two have NOTHING to do with each other.
more...
GCHope2011
11-15 10:35 PM
I had issues setting up recurring payments. I did setup one just now and let me know if it is drawing funds correctly.
ivar - welcome to the gang!!
ivar - welcome to the gang!!
hair hubby Ashton Kutcher
eastindia
11-12 09:49 AM
If you were a donor member you could have asked IV to help you. They helped people with EAD delays by talking to USCIS.
more...
anandrajesh
09-19 12:07 PM
In the Land of 10000 Lakes(Minnesota), State DL issues DL only till your I-94 validity.
I was waiting for my H1 Approval and that didnt turn up in time before my current one expired. (Thx to Extremely Efficient USCIS) The State revoked my Spouse's license and she was told that she cant drive till she produce a document that states we are legal here.
Fortunately they accepted my receipt notice and gave her 90 addl days to prove our Legal Status. What a Hassle...
I was waiting for my H1 Approval and that didnt turn up in time before my current one expired. (Thx to Extremely Efficient USCIS) The State revoked my Spouse's license and she was told that she cant drive till she produce a document that states we are legal here.
Fortunately they accepted my receipt notice and gave her 90 addl days to prove our Legal Status. What a Hassle...
hot Ashton Kutcher looking wet and
kaisersose
08-24 02:01 PM
So, does that mean there's no need to invoke AC21 after you get you get EAD, if you want to change employer before 180 days of your filing?
if you change your employer within 180 days of 485 RD, the employer can revoke your 140 which will invalidate your 485.
After 180 days you can switch using your H-1 too. The EAD is not necessary.
if you change your employer within 180 days of 485 RD, the employer can revoke your 140 which will invalidate your 485.
After 180 days you can switch using your H-1 too. The EAD is not necessary.
more...
house Ashton Kutcher Beach
raajpagare
01-24 04:46 AM
I have receiived the exact same RFE and the interesting thing is that my company is neither a staffing or a consulting company. Its a services and product based company.
The RFE states that if the petitioner is engaged in consulting or staffing, then send the supporting documents. But my company is not, so what are we suppoesed to send? Will write back on monday what the lawyer says.
The RFE states that if the petitioner is engaged in consulting or staffing, then send the supporting documents. But my company is not, so what are we suppoesed to send? Will write back on monday what the lawyer says.
tattoo For an underwear shoot,
gc_kaavaali
03-18 01:06 AM
Hi,
Some online tax return websites have capabilities of pulling your W2 information from IRS site. I know turbotax does. Print out all those copies and your pay stubs. Send it to IRS with letter stating your problem. Before you do please apply for extension as april 15th is last date for tax return filing.
My wife worked as a consultant for first half of 2008 with a desi employer as an employee (on W-2). After many calls and emails we received W-2 Thursday that has income and taxes of only first two months. Now he says that he showed remaining 4 months as his profit so he can only send 1099. Please advise if I can take any legal action against this employer.
Thank you
Some online tax return websites have capabilities of pulling your W2 information from IRS site. I know turbotax does. Print out all those copies and your pay stubs. Send it to IRS with letter stating your problem. Before you do please apply for extension as april 15th is last date for tax return filing.
My wife worked as a consultant for first half of 2008 with a desi employer as an employee (on W-2). After many calls and emails we received W-2 Thursday that has income and taxes of only first two months. Now he says that he showed remaining 4 months as his profit so he can only send 1099. Please advise if I can take any legal action against this employer.
Thank you
more...
pictures Ashton Kutcher rocking Ginch
gjoe
08-14 07:22 AM
We should put our previous agenda of recapturing of unsed visas, increasing visa numbers for EB, excluding family members from being counted in the quota and lifting per country limits in the back burner.
At the moment we should demand that USCIS release the real data of pending I485 application for FB and EB categories instead of the lame DOS visa bulletin they release every month. This data should include the number of application received every month for each of the category for the last 10 years because we have people from 1998 still waiting for their GC. I repeat "WE HAVE TO DEMAND". Once we get USCIS to disclose this information we can make our own personal plans.
Without the correct data we are just shooting in the dark. The basis of our ageda itself is not on solid foundation without proper data.
DEMAND FROM USCIS FOR THE PENDING I485 application stats and we will find an answer to all out problems
At the moment we should demand that USCIS release the real data of pending I485 application for FB and EB categories instead of the lame DOS visa bulletin they release every month. This data should include the number of application received every month for each of the category for the last 10 years because we have people from 1998 still waiting for their GC. I repeat "WE HAVE TO DEMAND". Once we get USCIS to disclose this information we can make our own personal plans.
Without the correct data we are just shooting in the dark. The basis of our ageda itself is not on solid foundation without proper data.
DEMAND FROM USCIS FOR THE PENDING I485 application stats and we will find an answer to all out problems
dresses Ashton Kutcher – having
Dhundhun
08-05 05:34 PM
PD for family based visa is based on the date you file your I-130 for your Spouse. Nothing to do with the Labor certification.
For unmarried sons and daughters of GC holder same PD is given as of parent - I saw couple of documents.
I am not sure about (2A) cases.
For unmarried sons and daughters of GC holder same PD is given as of parent - I saw couple of documents.
I am not sure about (2A) cases.
more...
makeup No, it#39;s Ashton Kutcher
techbuyer77
09-17 02:19 PM
i-140 was approved on december 2006
i-485 was filed on 6/2007
between december 2006 and september 2007 company got worst and worst also real estate market. Some people kept saying it will get better. It never got better.
i-485 was filed on 6/2007
between december 2006 and september 2007 company got worst and worst also real estate market. Some people kept saying it will get better. It never got better.
girlfriend Up About Ashton and Demi,
kevinkris
10-06 08:58 PM
I was just quoting that there may be legitimate reasons but this is not a good reason...
Fully aware this is not the right time to correct eachother, but their is something in me that forces me to dis-approve your comment on " ... legitimate cause for sucide". I hope you will take it in friendly spirit.
We all are fighting our battles on all levels in all the different ways ...be it financial, social, family or professional. And in some of these we will win and inothers we shall lose, if not have. And it might be that mental illness drove this young man into such desperate direction, but little did he realize the consequences of his near-sightedness. No matter how depressing and gloomy it may appear, we should not forget that tommorow can be better. Life is a cherished previliage given to us and we should put to it's best intended use as per God's will.
So let's be brave and encourage eachother so that no-one else show up on news in manner the departed souls. My deep sympathys to those affected by this tradegy and apologizes for any un-wonted offence.
Be brave, be strong ...
Fully aware this is not the right time to correct eachother, but their is something in me that forces me to dis-approve your comment on " ... legitimate cause for sucide". I hope you will take it in friendly spirit.
We all are fighting our battles on all levels in all the different ways ...be it financial, social, family or professional. And in some of these we will win and inothers we shall lose, if not have. And it might be that mental illness drove this young man into such desperate direction, but little did he realize the consequences of his near-sightedness. No matter how depressing and gloomy it may appear, we should not forget that tommorow can be better. Life is a cherished previliage given to us and we should put to it's best intended use as per God's will.
So let's be brave and encourage eachother so that no-one else show up on news in manner the departed souls. My deep sympathys to those affected by this tradegy and apologizes for any un-wonted offence.
Be brave, be strong ...
hairstyles Ashton Kutcher Tweets Photo of
Exultant
12-03 03:39 PM
Gurus,
Here is my situation:
I-140 approved - PD: May '06
I-485 filed - July 30 '07 (India)
EAD cards - Received
APs - Received
Due to a slowdown in their business, my employer is laying me off in Dec '07. I'm still short of 1 month to complete my 180 days of I-485 filling. However, they said they will not withdraw my I-140 and, to help me, will in fact keep me on their payroll until Jan '08, with my Jan '08 salary as my severance and my official status as on "paid leave". So far, so good.
I also have a job offer, and my new employer wants me to join them in Dec '07, on EAD. My question is: Can I be officially on the payroll of two companies simultaneously on H-1B and/or EAD? If yes, do I need to inform the USCIS of my status (new employer; AC21)? My other option is to say No to the new (attractive) job offer (or to try to convince them to wait until Feb '08, which they'll likely not agree to), and and take up another job in Feb '08, on EAD / H-1B transfer, using AC21. Please advise whether I'm fine with using the first option!!
Here is my situation:
I-140 approved - PD: May '06
I-485 filed - July 30 '07 (India)
EAD cards - Received
APs - Received
Due to a slowdown in their business, my employer is laying me off in Dec '07. I'm still short of 1 month to complete my 180 days of I-485 filling. However, they said they will not withdraw my I-140 and, to help me, will in fact keep me on their payroll until Jan '08, with my Jan '08 salary as my severance and my official status as on "paid leave". So far, so good.
I also have a job offer, and my new employer wants me to join them in Dec '07, on EAD. My question is: Can I be officially on the payroll of two companies simultaneously on H-1B and/or EAD? If yes, do I need to inform the USCIS of my status (new employer; AC21)? My other option is to say No to the new (attractive) job offer (or to try to convince them to wait until Feb '08, which they'll likely not agree to), and and take up another job in Feb '08, on EAD / H-1B transfer, using AC21. Please advise whether I'm fine with using the first option!!
qualified_trash
08-26 03:19 PM
NJ also extends until the I 94 date.
yestogc
07-17 02:57 PM
Seriously, site is down , I have not seen that too many times.............. is there someone on leave there ?
0 comments:
Post a Comment